spotcube.blogg.se - Conduktor gui apache accelsawersventurebeat

But how much effort does it take? Even using text expanders, it doesn't compare to the ease offered by web UIs.

Manageability features: No one disputes that from the command line, you can manage multiple clusters, Kafka brokers, topics, users, consumer groups, and ACLs.

However, managing the schema registry as well as deserializing Protobuf messages from the command line is inconvenient compared to doing so using a UI.

Schema support: Kafka supports ingesting data in multiple formats, including Avro and Protobuf.

The problem? These configurations tend to be complex, so doing them from the command line is time-consuming and challenging. Similarly, you can use access control lists (ACLs) to restrict access to certain topics.

Authentication and authorization: From the command line, you can set SSL and SASL to authenticate clients and brokers.

That said, in terms of user experience, it's debatable which approach is better since it depends on the value the UI adds to facilitate common tasks.

User experience (UX) and user interface (UI) quality: This is the biggest difference between the two approaches, since CLIs do not have a UI.

Furthermore, CLIs are especially useful for automating maintenance tasks through scripts, something that far exceeds the convenience of a UI. This defies the point of installing a graphical user interface. Many web UI and even Kafka administration platforms rely on CLI tools for maintenance tasks such as adding brokers, increasing the number of partitions, rebalancing, or changing replicas.

Maintenance features: This is another aspect where most web UIs leave a lot to be desired.

This is a point to which we will pay special attention during the review. That doesn't add much value, since you can manually configure an observability stack from the command line and get better results. Many Kafka web UIs only offer limited metrics monitoring.

Observability: To be fair, this is perhaps an area where many UIs fail.

Having explained why Kafka Tools is included, let's briefly review its strengths compared to web UIs: Last but not least, nothing prevents you from using Kafka Tools in conjunction with a web UI, so it doesn't hurt to include it. UI" debate, but rather so that each engineer judges which tool is more suitable for a given task. Not with the intention of creating a "CLI vs.

The main reason is to provide expert users-those accustomed to managing Kafka from the command line-with a clear perspective of the differences between using a UI and the CLI.

It's not a UI, though, so why is it included in this comparison? It offers a robust set of features that aid in managing and monitoring Kafka clusters. Kafka Tools by LinkedIn is an excellent choice for Kafka users. With that said, let's dig into the pros and cons of each of these tools. Additionally, even though it is not a web UI tool, we'll also include Kafka Tools by LinkedIn (more on the reasoning behind that shortly). Regarding the web UIs available for Kafka, the most relevant today are UI for Apache Kafka, Conduktor, and Redpanda Console, so they will be the ones included in this comparison. User experience (UX) and user interface (UI) quality.So, this article compares tools based on the following criteria: In our opinion, the aspects that you should consider to determine which Kafka web UI best suits your needs are those related to usability, security, observability, schema support, and maintainability. Let's start by answering the second question. First, what web UI choices do you have? And second, what's the best way to compare these tools in order to choose the best one? Intrigued by these benefits? This opens the door to two questions. Observability: Most web UIs feature some form of Kafka metrics visualization some even offer a complete observability solution with monitoring and alerting for metrics, logs, and traces.This makes Kafka web UIs an incredibly convenient way to manage Kafka on the go. Mobile access: Kafka web UIs are accessible from anywhere, allowing users to manage their Kafka clusters from any device, including mobile phones and tablets.They offer convenient access to features such as topic management, consumer groups, key metrics, cluster management, and more. Convenience: Kafka web UIs provide an intuitive graphical interface that allows users to quickly and easily interact with Kafka.If you're used to the reliable command line interface (CLI), you may be wondering if it's worth using a web UI to manage Apache Kafka.Īmong the advantages of these UI tools over traditional CLIs are: They allow users to configure, monitor, and manage Kafka from a web browser, providing a powerful and intuitive way to interact with it.

Kafka web UIs are graphical user interfaces (GUIs) that provide access to Apache Kafka® clusters.